• 主 编:
  • 黄思光
  • 主 任:
  • 张 洁
  • 刊 期:
  • 双月刊
  • 电 话:
  • 029-87092606;87092306
  • E-mail:
  • xuebaowq@263.net
  • 邮发代号:
  • 52-254
  • 创刊时间:
  • 2001年1月
  • 主办单位:
  • 西北农林科技大学
  • 主管单位:
  • 中华人民共和国教育部
  • 国内统一刊号:
  • CN 61-1376/C
  • 国际标准刊号:
  • ISSN 1009-9107
  • 编辑部地址:
  • 712100 陕西 杨凌 西北农林科大北校区34信箱
李静,张越杰.畜产品质量协同控制水平测度及障碍因子分析——以肉牛产业为例[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2026,26(1):149~160
畜产品质量协同控制水平测度及障碍因子分析——以肉牛产业为例
Measurement of Synergistic Control Level and Analysis of Obstacle Factors in Livestock Product Quality:A Case Study of the Beef Cattle Industry
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  畜产品  质量协同  牛肉  复合协同度模型  障碍因子
英文关键词:livestock products  quality synergy  beef  composite synergy degree model  obstacle factors
基金项目:国家现代农业产业技术体系肉牛牦牛产业经济研究专项(CARS-38)
作者单位
李静 (吉林农业大学 经济管理学院,长春 130118) 
张越杰 (吉林农业大学 经济管理学院,长春 130118) 
摘要点击次数: 121
全文下载次数: 26
中文摘要:
      提升畜产品质量协同控制水平是保障食品安全、促进畜牧业高质量发展的关键路径。以肉牛产业为例,以协同学为支撑,采用熵权-复合协同度模型与障碍度模型,从系统与维度两个层面系统评估肉牛养殖与屠宰加工环节的质量协同控制水平,并识别关键障碍因子。研究发现,从系统层面看,养殖与屠宰加工子系统的整体协同度为0.611 1,处于比较协同状态;但两子系统有序度差异显著,分别为0.410 9与0.908 9,养殖子系统有序度偏低,拉低了整体协同水平。从维度层面看,环境维护、投入品来源、检验防疫、动物福利、档案管理五个维度的协同度均大于0.6,处于比较协同或高度协同状态;而设施配置维度协同度仅为0.428 0,处于轻度失调状态,是维度层面协同推进的薄弱环节。障碍因子诊断结果进一步显示,设施配置是制约养殖与屠宰加工子系统协同发展的共同主要障碍因子;此外,投入品来源也是养殖子系统有序运行的主要障碍因子,检验防疫则是导致屠宰加工子系统稳定性较差的次要障碍因子。因此,应靶向补齐养殖端设施短板、依托屠宰端整合投入品供应链、搭建“标准共享+技术赋能”平台,推动畜牧业全产业链质量协同升级。
英文摘要:
      Enhancing the level of synergistic control of livestock product quality is a critical pathway to ensuring food safety and promoting high-quality development of the animal husbandry sector.Using the beef cattle industry as a case study and grounded in synergetics theory,this study employs an entropy-weighted composite synergy degree model and an obstacle degree model to systematically evaluate the level of quality synergistic control in both breeding and slaughter-processing stages from systemic and dimensional perspectives,while identifying key obstacle factors.The findings reveal that at the systemic level,the overall synergy degree between the breeding and slaughter-processing subsystems is 0.6111,indicating a relatively synergistic state.However,there is a significant disparity in the order degrees of the two subsystems (0.4109 and 0.9089, respectively), suggesting that the lower order in the breeding subsystem is constraining overall synergy.At the dimensional level,the synergy degrees of five dimensions-environmental maintenance,input source,inspection and epidemic prevention,animal welfare,and record management-all exceed 0.6,reflecting relatively or highly synergistic states.In contrast,the facility configuration dimension shows a synergy degree of only 0.4280,indicating a weakly synergistic state and representing a bottleneck in dimensional synergy progression.Further obstacle factor diagnosis shows that facility configuration is the primary common obstacle hindering synergistic development between the breeding and slaughter-processing subsystems.Additionally,input source is a major obstacle factor for the orderly operation of the breeding subsystem,while inspection and epidemic prevention is a secondary obstacle factor contributing to the relatively poor stability of the slaughter-processing subsystem.Going forward,targeted measures should be implemented to address facility shortcomings in breeding,integrate input supply chains through slaughtering endpoints,and establish a “standard-sharing+technology-empowerment” platform to drive quality synergy upgrading across the entire animal husbandry industry chain.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭